Blue gradient sphere graphic.

FLAME TREATING VS. LECTROTREAT

C

In the realm of plastic surface treatment, two contenders vie for supremacy: Flame Treating and LectroTreat. While both methods aim to enhance the adhesion properties of plastic parts, they diverge significantly in their approach and outcomes. Let’s delve into the intricacies of each technique to uncover their strengths and weaknesses.

Flame Treating:

Flame treating has long been a go-to method for enhancing surface adhesion in plastic parts. However, its reliance on open flames poses several drawbacks. One of the most significant disadvantages is the potential for shrinkage, warpage, surface crazing, and dulling of high gloss finishes. These issues can arise due to the uneven application of heat and the inherent variability of flame treatment processes.

Additionally, flame treating requires constant monitoring to ensure the flame is properly adjusted for effective treatment. This constant vigilance adds to labor costs and can lead to inconsistent treatment results. Moreover, the high energy consumption associated with flame treating, coupled with safety concerns surrounding open flames, makes it a less desirable option for many manufacturers.

LectroTreat:

In contrast, LectroTreat offers a revolutionary alternative to traditional flame treating methods. Designed for total uniform 360-degree treatment of three-dimensional parts, LectroTreat boasts several key advantages over its flame treating counterpart.

First and foremost, LectroTreat eliminates the risks of shrinkage, warpage, surface crazing, and dulling of high gloss finishes. Its precise process ensures an even, consistent surface treatment without the need for constant monitoring or adjustment. This not only saves on labor costs but also guarantees 100% treatment with one-time control adjustment.

Furthermore, LectroTreat is highly energy-efficient, consuming significantly less energy compared to flame treating methods. Its minimal heat application eliminates the need for heavier walled construction, reducing material costs and setup time. Additionally, LectroTreat’s simple installation requirements make it a cost-effective and user-friendly solution for manufacturers seeking to streamline their production processes.

Conclusion:

In the battle of plastic surface treatment methods, LectroTreat emerges as the clear winner. Its innovative design, precise treatment process, and cost-effective operation make it the preferred choice for manufacturers seeking to optimize their production lines. By eliminating the drawbacks associated with flame treating, LectroTreat paves the way for enhanced productivity, superior product quality, and overall manufacturing excellence.

Recent Posts

REVOLUTIONIZING THE INDUSTRY SINCE 1960